You're already paying for AI. Your team uses about a fifth of it.
Not because they're lazy, and not because the tool is bad. Because nobody set it up around the work they actually do — so they open it, get something generic, and go back to doing it by hand. We fix that. On their machines, with your documents, usually running the same week.
Where the week goes
The jobs worth handing over first
These are the ones that come up in almost every business we sit with. Yours will have its own — that is what the first call is for.
The report that eats a day
The monthly summary somebody rebuilds from scratch every time. Set up properly, it drafts itself from your own numbers in your own wording, and someone edits it instead of writing it.
The inbox that eats the morning
Sorting, triaging, and writing the same four replies with different names in them. This is usually the first thing people get back, and the one they notice most.
The document nobody wants to reformat
Turning a messy file into your template, your headings, your house style. Tedious, unskilled, and it lands on whoever is least able to say no.
The proposal written from nothing
Every quote or proposal starts from a blank page even though the last forty were 80% the same. Set up once against your real past work, this stops being a blank page.
The information typed twice
The same client details keyed into a second system because the two do not talk. Not glamorous. Usually the single biggest block of wasted hours in the building.
The notes nobody writes up
Meetings and calls where the actions live in somebody's head until they don't. This one is less about hours saved and more about the things that quietly get dropped.
Why it is not working yet
It is not a tool problem
Your team has access. What they do not have is a version of it that knows your work.
It does not know your work
Out of the box it has never seen your templates, your clients, your pricing, or a single example of what "good" looks like in your business. Of course the first answer is generic.
Most people are on the wrong one
Claude and ChatGPT are genuinely better at different jobs, and almost nobody switches because nobody told them there was a choice. Getting this right is usually the biggest single jump in quality, and it costs nothing.
Nobody set it up around a real task
A general-purpose assistant helps with everything and therefore nothing. Pointed at one specific job you do every week, with your own material behind it, it stops being a novelty.
Your team is already using AI
The question is whose account it is running on.
On the right account tier, your work is not used to train a model
You can see who has access, and remove it when someone leaves
It stops living on personal logins you do not control
You get it in writing, for your own clients and your professional body
And a short list of what should never go in, whatever the tier
How it runs
Four steps. You can stop after any of them.
A 20-minute call — free
We ask what your week actually looks like and where it jams. Bring one real document and we will do something useful with it on the call, so you can see what this is before you spend anything.
The workflow session — half a day
We watch how the work really moves through your business, not how the process document says it does. You leave with the three tasks worth handing over, ranked, and the account and data question answered in writing.
The setup — days, not weeks
Right accounts, set up on your team's machines, built around your documents and your wording, with the three tasks working. Then we sit with the people who will actually use it until they have done each one themselves.
Keeping it alive — optional, monthly
New staff need setting up, the models change every few months, and new tasks surface once people get the idea. This is the part that stops it quietly rotting six months from now.

What it costs
No packages off a list, because no two businesses need the same setup. After the call you get one written number for your business, and it does not move once you say yes. The workflow session comes off the setup if you go ahead — so if you do the whole thing, it costs nothing extra to start carefully.
Workflow session
Half a day. Find out what is actually worth doing.
Half a day watching how the work really moves through your business
The three tasks worth handing to AI first, ranked by hours returned
The tasks we think you should NOT automate, and why
Which tool fits which job — Claude, ChatGPT, or neither
The account, data and confidentiality answer in writing
A one-page note you can show your own clients or your professional body
Refunded in full against the setup fee if you go ahead
Setup
Installed on their machines. Working. Being used.
Correct account tier provisioned, so your work is not used to train a model
Set up on your team's own computers, not a portal they have to remember
Built around your documents, your templates and your wording
The three tasks from the session, working end to end
Training sat with the people who will use it, until each has done it themselves
A one-page handover per task — no manual nobody reads
If your team is not still using it after 60 days, we come back until they are
Kept working
So it does not rot.
One new task set up per quarter as people spot them
New starters set up and shown how it works
Kept current as the tools change — and they change often
A check that the original tasks are still actually being used
Somewhere to send the "can it do this?" questions
No lock-in. Cancel the month you stop getting value from it
Start here
Book the 20 minutes
Bring one real document. We will do something useful with it on the call.
No deck, no presentation, no forty-slide AI strategy. We will ask what your week looks like, tell you which parts of it are worth handing over, and which parts are not. If we cannot find anything worth doing, we will say so and the call will be over in eight minutes.
Working hours
Monday - Friday: 09:00 - 18:00 EST
Saturday & Sunday: By appointment
FAQ
The questions we get asked
Mostly on the first call, usually in this order.
Where does our data go? We have client confidentiality obligations.
Our team will not use it. We have bought things like this before.
We already pay for ChatGPT or Copilot. Why would we pay you as well?
How long before we see anything?
Do we need someone technical?
What if you tell us there is nothing worth doing?
Do we own it, or are we renting it from you?
Go and ask your team
How many of them have pasted a client document into ChatGPT this month? Whatever that number is, it is worth twenty minutes of your time.
Or just send a note
Tell us what eats the most time in your week and we will tell you whether it is worth handing over.

